On Language

Headshot by The Slip
[audio:http://theslip.com/mp3/TheSlipHeadshot.mp3]

Alright, I’m going to try to build up a semi intelligible argument here, but it may take a while, so stick with me while I lay the foundation.

Almost every disagreement, however petty, can be boiled down to a dispute of definition. As long as a both arguments are supported by logic, one word can be identified as the concept they are disagreeing upon. A simple and popular example is abortion:

Each side disagrees on when life begins. Pro-Lifers believe that life starts on conception, and Pro-Choicers believe that life begins upon birth, or even the severing of the umbilical chord. Whatever your stance, what matters here is that the definition of ‘life’ is being contested.

Another, more comical, example comes from former President Bill Clinton:

It depends on what the meaning of the words ‘is’ is.

Ok, maybe that last one isn’t so relevant, but no matter. There are obviously thousands of other examples, and I’ll leave you to find those on your own. Now that we have established that the root of all disagreement is definition, let’s move on.

Swear words have been taboo, from high society to simple farm-folk, for as long as they have existed. I’ve always wondered why. The only reason I was ever given by my parents was that they are ‘bad words.’

I think the explanation is related to the concept above. Most swear words have lots of different uses. I often use the word ‘shit’ as a synonym of ‘stuff’ instead of it’s literal meaning. When I talk about “all that shit in the corner” it is very rare that I am actually talking about a pile of feces. And of course the word ‘fuck’ can be used in countless parts of speech (as shown by this popular video). Since ‘fuck’ can carry so many meanings with it, the intended meaning can easily be obscured. So while it may be totally innocent in its intent, the possible derogatory or sexual meaning could offend people who misunderstand.

In 1986 Frank Zappa went on Crossfire to argue against censorship in the media. Several times throughout the program he defends explicit lyrics by saying “They’re just words.” But he is disassociating the ideas from the words. This isn’t an argument for censorship, by any means, but it may be an argument against versatile words. Even words that aren’t considered ‘swear words’ can fall into this category. When a normal word becomes widely used as a slang term for some meaning other than its original, it can cause confusion similar to the swear words.

‘Gay’ is a great example of one of these words. Originally ‘gay’ was used to describe fun, or happiness. Over time, its meaning gradually changed to refer to homosexuals, to the point where its original use is no longer the primary one. And past that, the term ‘gay’ became used to describe something undesirable (this use obviously stems from homophobia). So if I use ‘gay’ in a sentence, it could be just a misconstrued as many ways as ‘fuck’ can.

Just food for thought.

3 thoughts on “On Language”

  1. Very observant. And thoughtful. I like.

    Similar to your explanation, I remember in grade school one of my comrades was discussing with a teacher the definition of “bitch” – a female dog. And the teacher said something like, “You’re right, the word didn’t used to be bad. Until people started using it to be mean to people.”

    I’m all about free language. I don’t necessarily support offending people (well, maybe sometimes), but I side with Zappa that the words aren’t the ones to blame.

    Notice that other words can be equally vicious but don’t get censored. “Screw you!” “You whore!” By the logic that a “bad word” is an offensive one, maybe we should even censor the words “moron” and “doo-doo head.”

    This, much like the less-than-subtle racial segregation of our generation, is very deeply ingrained in our society, and could only really be fixed if all children were suddenly raised on a foundation of these insightful and open-minded principles.

  2. Very true, if it really was offensive ideas which really irked people, then why are euphemisms accepted? Does calling it ‘fornication’ (as Tom Braden does in Crossfire) instead of ‘fucking’ really make a difference?

    Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure I’m preaching to the choir. I’d love to eventually discuss this with someone who was on the other side of this issue.

Comments are closed.